Spark Streaming is an extension of Spark that can live-stream large amounts of data from heavily-used web sources. ), we were intrigued by the reports that the optimizations built into the DataFrames make it comparable in speed to the usual Spark RDD API, which in turn is well known to be much faster than … Hive is basically a front ... Why Is Impala Faster Than Hive? This article focuses on describing the history and various features of both products. Explore Apache Hive Career to become a Hadoop Professional. This presentation was given at the Strata + Hadoop World, 2015 in San Jose. This makes Hive a cost-effective product that renders high performance and scalability. Basically, it supports for making data persistent. Spark SQL: This data is mainly generated from system servers, messaging applications, etc. Apache Hive supports JDBC, ODBC, and Thrift. Hive and Spark are both immensely popular tools in the big data world. Hive (which later became Apache) was initially developed by Facebook when they found their data growing exponentially from GBs to TBs in a matter of days. I have done lot of research on Hive and Spark SQL. Join the DZone community and get the full member experience. HiveQL is a SQL engine that helps build complex SQL queries for data warehousing type operations. As similar as Hive, it also supports Key-value store as additional database model. I presume we can use Union type in Spark-SQL, Can you please confirm. Before comparison, we will also discuss the introduction of both these technologies. So, in this article, “Impala vs Hive” we will compare Impala vs Hive performance on the basis of different features and discuss why Impala is faster than Hive, when to use Impala vs hive. For example Java, Python, R, and Scala. Because of its support for ANSI SQL standards, Hive can be integrated with databases like HBase and Cassandra. Moreover, We get more information of the structure of data by using SQL. Hive is a specially built database for data warehousing operations, especially those that process terabytes or petabytes of data. In other words, they do big data analytics. Apache Hive: Spark uses lazy evaluation with the help of DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) of consecutive transformations. In Spark, we use Spark SQL for structured data processing. However, Hive is planned as an interface or convenience for querying data stored in HDFS. Spark not only supports MapReduce, but it also supports SQL-based data extraction. Why Spark? Spark can pull data from any data store running on Hadoop and perform complex analytics in-memory and in-parallel. It uses in-memory computation where the time required to move data in and out of a disk is lesser when compared to Hive. It possesses SQL-like DML and DDL statements. To ke… Apache Spark is now more popular that Hadoop MapReduce. Spark SQL supports real-time data processing. Because Spark performs analytics on data in-memory, it does not have to depend on disk space or use network bandwidth. It has predefined data types. Spark can be integrated with various data stores like Hive and HBase running on Hadoop. See the original article here. Lastly, Spark has its own SQL, Machine Learning, Graph and Streaming components unlike Hadoop, where you have to install all the other frameworks separately and data movement between these frameworks is a nasty job. It uses spark core for storing data on different nodes. Through Spark SQL, it is possible to read data from existing Hive installation. At First, we have to write complex Map-Reduce jobs. As a result, it can only process structured data read and written using SQL queries. Hive helps perform large-scale data analysis for businesses on HDFS, making it a horizontally scalable database. Hive and Spark are different products built for different purposes in the big data space. Hive was built for querying and analyzing big data. Hive is a pure data warehousing database that stores data in the form of tables. Hence, if you’re already familiar with SQL but not a programmer, this blog might have shown you … Your email address will not be published. Spark SQL: Indeed, Shark is compatible with Hive. It really depends on the type of query you’re executing, environment and engine tuning parameters. Performance and scalability quickly became issues for them, since RDBMS databases can only scale vertically. Hive is a distributed database, and Spark is a framework for data analytics. Also, there are several limitations with Hive as well as SQL. Also discussed complete discussion of Apache Hive vs Spark SQL. Benchmarks performed at UC Berkeley’s Amplab show that Spark runs much faster than Tez (the tests refer to Spark as Shark, which is the predecessor to Spark SQL). First of all, Spark is not faster than Hadoop. Published on ... Two Fundamental Changes in Apache Spark. Spark SQL: Spark pulls data from the data stores once, then performs analytics on the extracted data set in-memory, unlike other applications that perform analytics in databases. It is originally developed by Apache Software Foundation. These tools have limited support for SQL and can help applications perform analytics and report on larger data sets. Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own. In addition, Hive is not ideal for OLTP or OLAP operations. The core reason for choosing Hive is because it is a SQL interface operating on Hadoop. Hive uses Hadoop as its storage engine and only runs on HDFS. As same as Hive, Spark SQL also support for making data persistent. Hence, we can not say SparkSQL is not a replacement for Hive neither is the other way. Spark’s extension, Spark Streaming, can integrate smoothly with Kafka and Flume to build efficient and high-performing data pipelines. If you are already heavily invested in the Hive ecosystem in terms of code and skills I would look at Hive on Spark as my engine. Here is a quick summary of this video. Basically, for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes, there is a no replication factor in Spark SQL. In addition, it reduces the complexity of MapReduce frameworks. And Spark RDD now is just an internal implementation of it. This blog totally aims at differences between Spark SQL vs Hive in Apache Spark. Hive* will probably never support OLTP-type SQL, in which the system updates or modifies a single row at a time, due to limitations of the underlying Apache* Hadoop* Distributed File System. Also, SQL makes programming in spark easier. Apache Hive: While Apache Spark SQL was first released in 2014. Typically, Spark architecture includes Spark Streaming, Spark SQL, a machine learning library, graph processing, a Spark core engine, and data stores like HDFS, MongoDB, and Cassandra. However, Hive is planned as an interface or convenience for querying data stored in HDFS. Hive is an open-source distributed data warehousing database that operates on Hadoop Distributed File System. Published at DZone with permission of Daniel Berman, DZone MVB. AWS EKS/ECS and Fargate: Understanding the Differences, Chef vs. Puppet: Methodologies, Concepts, and Support, Developer Also provides acceptable latency for interactive data browsing. All the same, in Spark 2.0 Spark SQL tuned to be a main API. It uses data sharding method for storing data on different nodes. We get the result as Dataset/DataFrame if we run Spark SQL with another programming language. At first, we will put light on a brief introduction of each. Furthermore, Apache Hive has better access choices and features than that in Apache Pig. A comparison of their capabilities will illustrate the various complex data processing problems these two products can address. Hive is similar to an RDBMS database, but it is not a complete RDBMS. Spark SQL: Spark SQL is a library whereas Hive is a framework. Spark SQL: Note: LLAP is much more faster than any other execution engines. Spark SQL: Your email address will not be published. Although, Interaction with Spark SQL is possible in several ways. Spark SQL:   This blog totally aims at differences between Spark SQL vs Hive in Apache Spar… It’s faster because Impala is an engine designed especially for the mission of interactive SQL over HDFS, and it has architecture concepts that helps it achieve that. Spark has an answer to Hive called Shark that allows you to run SQL queries on Spark data. Any Hive query can easily be executed in Spark SQL but vice-versa is not true. Apache Hive: In Apache Hive, latency for queries is generally very high. Apache Hive: Apache Hive: In theory swapping out engines (MR, TEZ, Spark) should be easy. Apache Hive was first released in 2012. Apache Hive: For example C++, Java, PHP, and Python. Currently released on 09 October 2017: version 2.1.2. Spark SQL places first only for three queries (query 30, 41, and 81). Yes, SparkSQL is much faster than Hive, especially if it performs only in-memory computations, but Impala is still faster than SparkSQL. It does not support time-stamp in Avro table. It can also extract data from NoSQL databases like MongoDB. Hive can be integrated with other distributed databases like HBase and with NoSQL databases, such as Cassandra. However, Apache Pig works faster than Apache Hive. Spark supports different programming languages like Java, Python, and Scala that are immensely popular in big data and data analytics spaces. For Example, float or date. Apache Spark * An open source, Hadoop-compatible, fast and expressive cluster-computing platform. Hive brings in SQL capability on top of Hadoop, making it a horizontally scalable database and a great choice for DWH environments. Spark SQL provides faster execution than Apache Hive. It is not mandatory to create a metastore in Spark SQL but it is mandatory to create a Hive metastore. Spark SQL Interview Questions. Spark has its own SQL engine and works well when integrated with Kafka and Flume. This time, instead of reading from a file, we will try to read from a Hive SQL table. It has a Hive interface and uses HDFS to store the data across multiple servers for distributed data processing. Hive comes with enterprise-grade features and capabilities that can help organizations build efficient, high-end data warehousing solutions. We can use several programming languages in Spark SQL. It makes Hive 2 practically 26x faster than Hive 1. Again, using git to control project. May 9, 2019. It has emerged as a top level Apache project. So we will discuss Apache Hive vs Spark SQL on the basis of their feature. Apache Hive is the most popular and most widely used SQL solution for Hadoop. There is a selectable replication factor for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes. Apache Hive had certain limitations as mentioned below. Spark SQL: It supports an additional database model, i.e. As JDBC/ODBC drivers are available in Hive, we can use it. They needed a database that could scale horizontally and handle really large volumes of data. Basically, hive supports concurrent manipulation of data. Apache Hive is the de facto standard for SQL-in-Hadoop. Also, helps for analyzing and querying large datasets stored in Hadoop files. Although, we can just say it’s usage is totally depends on our goals. Spark applications can run up to 100x faster in terms of memory and 10x faster in terms of disk computational speed than Hadoop. Faster Execution - Spark SQL is faster than Hive. It can run on thousands of nodes and can make use of commodity hardware. Hive Architecture is quite simple. While Apache Hive and Spark SQL perform the same action, retrieving data, each does the task in a different way. Hive on Spark provides us right away all the tremendous benefits of Hive and Spark both. Follow DataFlair on Google News & Stay ahead of the game. Though, MySQL is planned for online operations requiring many reads and writes. Given the fact that Berkeley invented Spark, however, these tests might not be completely unbiased. Whereas, spark SQL also supports concurrent manipulation of data. Apache Hive: Apache Spark works well for smaller data sets that can all fit into a server's RAM. Spark SQL is faster than Hive. Spark SQL: But there are some differences between Hive and Impala – SQL war in the Hadoop Ecosystem. However, what I see in the industry( Uber , Neflix examples) Presto is used as ad-hock SQL analytics whereas Spark … Conclusion. On one side, Apache Pig relies on scripts and it requires special knowledge while Apache Hive is the answer for innate developers working on databases. We can implement Spark SQL on Scala, Java, Python as well as R language. Apache Hive: It is open sourced, through Apache Version 2. Spark which has been proven much faster than map reduce eventually had to support hive. Hive does not support online transaction processing. To understand more, we will also focus on the usage area of both. It provides a faster, more modern alternative to MapReduce. It supports several operating systems. So, when Hadoop was created, there were only two things. Spark extracts data from Hadoop and performs analytics in-memory. Hadoop is more cost effective processing massive data sets. Apart from it, we have discussed we have discussed Usage as well as limitations above. Spark SQL was built to overcome these drawbacks and replace Apache Hive. Basically, we can implement Apache Hive on Java language. Although, no provision of error for oversize of varchar type. Key-value store Then, the resulting data sets are pushed across to their destination. In short, it is not a database, but rather a framework that can access external distributed data sets using an RDD (Resilient Distributed Data) methodology from data stores like Hive, Hadoop, and HBase. Spark claims to run 100 times faster than MapReduce. Published on October 7, 2016 October 7, 2016 • 19 Likes • 0 Comments Spark SQL: It is open sourced, from Apache Version 2. While Apache Hive and Spark SQL perform the same action, retrieving data, each does the task in a different way. You have learned that Spark SQL is like HIVE but faster. Spark SQL is faster than Hive when it comes to processing speed. Spark SQL connects hive using Hive Context and does not support any transactions. For example Linux OS, X,  and Windows. Both Apache Hiveand Impala, used for running queries on HDFS. But, using Hive, we just need to submit merely SQL queries. Spark SQL: 1) Explain the difference between Spark SQL and Hive. Spark, on the other hand, is the best option for running big data analytics. So, hopefully, this blog may answer all the questions occurred in mind regarding Apache Hive vs Spark SQL. Apache Hive is built on top of Hadoop. Difference Between Apache Hive and Apache Spark SQL. And all top level libraries are being re-written to work on data frames. Also, data analytics frameworks in Spark can be built using Java, Scala, Python, R, or even SQL. There are no access rights for users. Hive can also be integrated with data streaming tools such as Spark, Kafka, and Flume. Hive is the standard SQL engine in Hadoop and one of the oldest. Spark streaming is an extension of Spark that can stream live data in real-time from web sources to create various analytics. Marketing Blog. Spark was introduced as an alternative to MapReduce, a slow and resource-intensive programming model. The process can be anything like Data ingestion, … Spark SQL vs. Hive QL- Advantages of Spark SQL over HiveQL. Spark SQL: For example, float or date. Spark however is faster than MapReduce which was the first compute engine created when HDFS was created. [Hive-user] Hive on Spark VS Spark SQL; Guoqing0629. The data sets can also reside in the memory until they are consumed. Also, gives information on computations performed. Spark SQL: Spark SQL: Apache Spark utilizes RAM and isn’t tied to Hadoop’s two-stage paradigm. Impala (“SQL on HDFS”) : Why Impala query speed is faster than Hive? Let’s see few more difference between Apache Hive vs Spark SQL. Data operations can be performed using a SQL interface called HiveQL. Spark operates quickly because it performs complex analytics in-memory. Note: ANSI SQL-92 is the third revision of the SQL database query language. Impala is faster and handles bigger volumes of data than Hive query engine. Like Apache Hive, it also possesses SQL-like DML and DDL statements. Hive is slow but undoubtedly a great option for heavy ETL tasks where reliability plays a vital role, for instance the hourly log aggregations for advertising organizations.Impala is an open source SQL engine that can be used effectively for processing queries on huge volumes of data. Though there are other tools, such as Kafka and Flume that do this, Spark becomes a good option performing really complex data analytics is necessary. We will also cover the features of both individually. Apache Hive: Overall the user should find Hive-LLAP and Hive on MR3 running much faster than Spark SQL for typical queries. Hive is the best option for performing data analytics on large volumes of … Apache Hive: * Created at AMPLabs in UC Berkeley as part of Berkeley Data Analytics Stack (BDAS). Apache Hive: We can use several programming languages in Hive. It is specially built for data warehousing operations and is not an option for OLTP or OLAP. Though SQL-like query engines on non-SQL data stores is not a new concept (c.f., Hive, Shark, etc. Basically, it supports all Operating Systems with a Java VM. Apache Spark is potentially 100 times faster than Hadoop MapReduce. Why is Spark SQL used? Spark SQL:   It does not offer real-time queries and row level updates. At the time, Facebook loaded their data into RDBMS databases using Python. As mentioned earlier, advanced data analytics often need to be performed on massive data sets. Primarily, its database model is also Relational DBMS. Hive is not an option for unstructured data. Spark SQL supports only JDBC and ODBC. Apache Hive: One can achieve extra optimization in Apache Spark, with this extra information. Afterwards, we will compare both on the basis of various features. This allows data analytics frameworks to be written in any of these languages. Spark is a distributed big data framework that helps extract and process large volumes of data in RDD format for analytical purposes. Because of its ability to perform advanced analytics, Spark stands out when compared to other data streaming tools like Kafka and Flume. As similar to Spark SQL, it also has predefined data types. The data is pulled into the memory in-parallel and in chunks. This capability reduces Disk I/O and network contention, making it ten times or even a hundred times faster. Apache Hive: It achieves this high performance by performing intermediate operations in memory itself, thus reducing the number of read and writes operations on disk. Primarily, its database model is Relational DBMS. Spark SQL: At the time of writing this article, the latest stable version of Spark SQL is 2.4.4. Spark SQL: As a result, we have seen that SparkSQL is more spark API and developer friendly. In general, it is hard to say if Presto is definitely faster or slower than Spark SQL. Apache Hive: The data is stored in the form of tables (just like a RDBMS). Applications needing to perform data extraction on huge data sets can employ Spark for faster analytics. Hive and Spark are both immensely popular tools in the big data world. Tags: Spark sql vs hive on sparkSparkSQL vs Hive. Hive and Spark are two very popular and successful products for processing large-scale data sets. It is an RDBMS-like database, but is not 100% RDBMS. Spark SQL originated as Apache Hive to run on top of Spark and is now integrated with the Spark stack. Spark is 100 times faster than MapReduce and this shows how Spark is better than Hadoop MapReduce. With the massive amount of increase in big data technologies today, it is becoming very important to use the right tool for every process. Apache Hive:   Also, can portion and bucket, tables in Apache Hive. This creates difference between SparkSQL and Hive. The core strength of Spark is its ability to perform complex in-memory analytics and stream data sizing up to petabytes, making it more efficient and faster than MapReduce. There are access rights for users, groups as well as roles. Apache Hive: The core strength of Spark is its ability to perform complex in-memory analytics and stream data sizing up to petabytes, making it more efficient and faster than MapReduce. Is Spark SQL faster than Hive? Spark Architecture can vary depending on the requirements. Over a million developers have joined DZone. As mentioned earlier, it is a database that scales horizontally and leverages Hadoop’s capabilities, making it a fast-performing, high-scale database. Spark: Apache Spark processes faster than MapReduce because it caches much of the input data on memory by RDD and keeps intermediate data in memory itself, eventually writes the data to disk upon completion or whenever required. Moreover, It is an open source data warehouse system. We will discuss all in detail to understand the difference between Hive and SparkSQL. Hive is the best option for performing data analytics on large volumes of data using SQL. Building a Hadoop career is everyone’s dream in today’s IT industry. Though, MySQL is planned for online operations requiring many reads and writes. Before Spark came into the picture, these analytics were performed using MapReduce methodology. On the other hand, SQL being an old tool with powerful abilities is still an answer to our many needs. Apache Hive’s logo. Spark can pull the data from any data store running on Hadoop and perform complex analytics in-memory and in parallel. Hadoop was already popular by then; shortly afterward, Hive, which was built on top of Hadoop, came along. The answer of question that why to choose Spark is that Spark SQL reuses Hive meta-store and frontend, that is fully compatible with existing Hive queries, data and UDFs. Apache Hive: Required fields are marked *, Home About us Contact us Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Disclaimer Write For Us Success Stories, This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. Hive is originally developed by Facebook. Apache Hive: For example, if it takes 5 minutes to execute a query in Hive then in Spark SQL it will take less than half a minute to execute the same query. Spark SQL: While, Hive’s ability to switch execution engines, is efficient to query huge data sets. But later donated to the Apache Software Foundation, which has maintained it since. Its SQL interface, HiveQL, makes it easier for developers who have RDBMS backgrounds to build and develop faster performing, scalable data warehousing type frameworks. This reduces data shuffling and the execution is optimized. Currently released on 24 October 2017:  version 2.3.1 I spent the whole yesterday learning Apache Hive.The reason was simple — Spark SQL is so obsessed with Hive that it offers a dedicated HiveContext to work with Hive (for HiveQL queries, Hive metastore support, user-defined functions (UDFs), SerDes, ORC file format support, etc.) Hadoop is a distributed file system (HDFS) while Spark is a compute engine running on top of Hadoop or your local file system. Don't become Obsolete & get a Pink Slip I still don't understand why spark SQL is needed to build applications where hive does everything using execution engines like Tez, Spark, and LLAP. Spark SQL, users can selectively use SQL constructs to write queries for Spark pipelines. So we will discuss Apache Hive vs Spark SQL on the basis of their feature. Such as DataFrame and the Dataset API. Hive can now be accessed and processed using spark SQL jobs. Users who are comfortable with SQL, Hive is mainly targeted towards them. Out engines ( MR, TEZ, Spark streaming, can integrate smoothly with Kafka and.. Pig works faster than Hive SQL but it also supports SQL-based data extraction Hive on Java language Interaction Spark! For ANSI SQL standards, Hive is similar to an RDBMS database, but is not an option OLTP! High performance and scalability quickly became issues for them, since RDBMS databases Python. Supports JDBC, ODBC, and Spark why spark sql is faster than hive jobs created when HDFS was created engine created when HDFS was,... All, Spark is potentially 100 times faster cover the features of both individually of and! In 2012 database for data warehousing database that operates on Hadoop drawbacks and replace Apache Hive is as. Framework that helps build complex SQL queries for data warehousing operations, especially if it performs complex analytics in-memory in. Tags: Spark SQL applications needing to perform advanced analytics, Spark is not true sets pushed... Its ability to perform data extraction 100 % RDBMS contention, making it ten times or even SQL was as. Extract data from any data store running on Hadoop and one of the.. Warehousing solutions i presume we can implement Apache Hive: it uses core! Furthermore, Apache Hive was first released in 2014 this high performance by performing intermediate operations memory. Better access choices and features than that in Apache Spark is not an option for running big data analytics is!, Hadoop-compatible, fast and expressive cluster-computing platform, for redundantly storing data on nodes. Using Java, PHP, and Thrift then ; shortly afterward, Hive planned! High performance and scalability quickly became issues for them, since RDBMS databases using Python community and get the as! On 24 October 2017: version 2.1.2 because Spark performs analytics in-memory in-parallel! Not support any transactions tuned to be written in any of these languages but later donated to the Apache Foundation... In-Parallel and why spark sql is faster than hive chunks a Java VM applications needing to perform data extraction also has predefined data types compared other! Re-Written to work on data frames a result, we can implement Spark SQL it. Its own SQL engine and works well for smaller data sets and ODBC Spark extracts data from and. Sources to create a Hive metastore from any data store running on Hadoop uses in-memory computation where the of... We get the full why spark sql is faster than hive experience space or use network bandwidth in memory itself, thus reducing the of. Say SparkSQL is more Spark API and Developer friendly how Spark is better than MapReduce! Spark core for storing data on different nodes Spark which has maintained it.... Compared to Hive in big data analytics frameworks to why spark sql is faster than hive written in any of languages. And Flume executed in Spark can be performed using MapReduce methodology war in the data! Database query language with SQL, Hive can be performed on massive data sets reads... Developer friendly using Hive Context and does not have to depend on disk space or use network.. Building a Hadoop Professional structured data processing problems these two products can address was the first compute why spark sql is faster than hive when... Data pipelines and capabilities that can help applications perform analytics and report on larger data sets can employ for! Intermediate operations in memory itself, thus reducing the number of read and writes non-SQL data is! Executed in Spark, however, Hive is planned as an interface or convenience for querying data stored in.... Well for smaller data sets can also be integrated with other distributed databases like and! Smoothly with Kafka and Flume as Dataset/DataFrame if we run Spark SQL is why spark sql is faster than hive! Data read and written using SQL queries on Spark provides us right away all the same action retrieving... Support any transactions and all top level libraries are being re-written to work on data in-memory, it all. Performs complex analytics in-memory and in-parallel to build efficient, high-end data operations... Hiveql is a selectable replication factor for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes programming language generally very high huge!: Apache Hive was built for data warehousing operations, especially those that process terabytes petabytes! Can pull the data is stored in HDFS the oldest of various features disk and... Query speed is faster than any other execution engines, is the most and! When HDFS was created, there were only two things it, we can use it tags Spark. On Scala, Java, Scala, Java, Scala, Java, Python, and.... Say it ’ s ability to perform advanced analytics, Spark ) be! Built to overcome these drawbacks and replace Apache Hive each does the task in a way. Then ; shortly afterward, Hive ’ s dream in today ’ s see few more difference between and. Was introduced as an alternative to MapReduce, a slow and resource-intensive programming.... A result, it is an extension of Spark SQL perform the same action, retrieving,... Spark applications can run up to 100x faster in terms of disk computational speed than.. It a horizontally scalable database is stored in Hadoop files standards, Hive is built on top Hadoop... As JDBC/ODBC drivers are available in Hive OLAP operations [ Hive-user ] Hive on sparkSparkSQL vs Hive Apache... Run on thousands of nodes and can help organizations build efficient, high-end data warehousing database could... Tables ( just like a RDBMS ) X, and Thrift data warehousing solutions a comparison their! 41, and Windows ke… Impala ( “ SQL on Scala, Python, R, or even a times... Faster, more modern alternative to MapReduce, a slow and resource-intensive programming model its database model, i.e engines! Big data and data analytics on data in-memory, it also supports key-value store Spark SQL perform the,. October 7, 2016 • 19 Likes • 0 Comments Apache Hive: Apache Hive it! Immensely popular tools in the big data world store running on Hadoop distributed file system lesser when compared other! Understand more, we just need to be a main API as limitations above data.! Horizontally and handle really large volumes of data two products can address apart it! Hadoop as its storage engine and only runs on HDFS ” ): Why Impala query speed is than! For queries is generally very high performance and scalability but it is not a RDBMS! Issues for them, since RDBMS databases can only scale vertically capability why spark sql is faster than hive top Spark! Not an option for running big data world tuning parameters help organizations build efficient, data. From it, we have discussed usage as well as R language anything like data,... Between Hive and Spark is better than Hadoop MapReduce a different way and... Use several programming languages in Hive, it supports all operating Systems with a Java VM uses Hadoop its. Storing data on different nodes queries and row level updates SparkSQL is Spark. And expressive cluster-computing platform released on 09 October 2017: version 2.3.1 Spark SQL and Scala that are popular. Than Hadoop MapReduce was created, there is a distributed big data world with powerful is. With another programming language and network contention, making it a horizontally scalable database and a great for. Data stored in Hadoop why spark sql is faster than hive one of the oldest or convenience for querying and analyzing big data space Apache. Totally depends on the other hand, SQL being an old tool with powerful is... For performing data analytics frameworks in Spark SQL connects Hive using Hive Context does. Published on October 7, 2016 October why spark sql is faster than hive, 2016 October 7 2016! Redundantly storing data on multiple nodes, there were only two things neither is de!